<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hope is Not a Foreign Policy &#187; Peter Feaver</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/tag/peter-feaver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org</link>
	<description>Conservative commentary on foreign policy, American politics, and current events</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:57:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fareed Zakaria&#8217;s Latest Critique</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/03/17/fareed-zakarias-latest-critique/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/03/17/fareed-zakarias-latest-critique/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Skypek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Feaver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Fareed Zakaria is an impressive thinker and his commentary is usually rather thought-provoking.  I don't always agree with him, but he often communicates some interesting points.  However, his disdain for President George W. Bush continues to color his analysis as well as his reputation as an objective analyst.  Peter Feaver has an interesting <a href="http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/03/17/is_fareed_zakaria_serious">post</a> over at Shadow Government on Fareed Zakaria's latest critique.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">Fareed Zakaria is an impressive thinker and his commentary is usually rather thought-provoking.  I don&#8217;t always agree with him, but he often communicates some interesting points.  However, his disdain for President George W. Bush continues to color his analysis as well as his reputation as an objective analyst.  Peter Feaver has an interesting <a href="http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/03/17/is_fareed_zakaria_serious">post</a> over at Shadow Government on Fareed Zakaria&#8217;s latest critique.</p>
<iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org%2F2009%2F03%2F17%2Ffareed-zakarias-latest-critique%2F&amp;layout=standard&amp;show_faces=true&amp;width=450&amp;action=like&amp;font=arial&amp;colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:80px"></iframe>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/03/17/fareed-zakarias-latest-critique/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

