Posts Tagged ‘Grand Strategy’

Sunday, September 12th, 2010 at 10:19am

A Conservative Foreign Policy Reading List

This list is certainly not comprehensive, but it provides a good sampling of the various arguments that exist today among conservative foreign policy thinkers.  A few of these pieces are older but reflect some of the best conservative thinking on foreign policy I’ve ever read.  Of particular interest to conservatives should be Robert Taft’s reminder that “…the overriding purpose of all American foreign policy should be the maintenance of the liberty and peace of our people of the United States…”  Unfortunately, there are a number of self-described conservatives who have forgotten (or never cared to embrace) this important reality.

Saturday, May 29th, 2010 at 5:24pm

Obama’s Grand Strategy

President Barack Obama recently released his administration’s National Security Strategywhich outlines his vision for America’s role in the world and presents a broad blueprint for how the country can achieve security.  Grand strategy is an academic term used to describe the highest level of statecraft.  The theoretical formula for crafting a grand strategy is pretty straightforward:  first, you define the interests of the state; second, you identify the threats to those interests; and third, you figure out how to protect and advance those interests using the political, economic, and military resources you have.  Crafting an effective grand strategy in the real world, however, is much more difficult because you have to contend with the complex realities of the world:  domestic…

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010 at 7:07pm

Political Correctness in the QDR

Posted by Tom Skypek in American Foreign Policy

A recent analysis of the 2010 QDR by the Center for American Progress claims, “…the 2010 QDR abandons the Bush administration’s “Long War” construct that oversimplified the nature of the struggle against violent extremists.”  This claim implies that the QDR clarified the nature of this conflict.  The QDR doesn’t even accurately identify the threat.  It does not acknowledge that there is an international campaign led by Islamic extremists to kill Americans.  I realize that it’s not politically correct to identify threats without obfuscation, but the failure to identify the source of this threat in the QDR is troubling.  The terms “violent extremism” and “extremism” are generalities.  Al Qaeda is more specific but it is simply a way to skirt…

© 2010 Hope is Not a Foreign Policy: Conservative commentary on foreign policy, American politics, and current events