<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Hope is Not a Foreign Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org</link>
	<description>Advocating Realism to Advance the National Interest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:10:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Advisor Anita Dunn:  Mao &#8220;My Favorite Political Philosopher&#8221; by Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/16/obama-advisor-anita-dunn-mao-my-favorite-political-philosopher/comment-page-1/#comment-3756</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=811#comment-3756</guid>
		<description>Maybe you should!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you should!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Dying Art of Nuclear Strategy by David Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/03/15/the-dying-art-of-nuclear-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>David Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 18:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=721#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>Do any of your previous articles discuss strategic nuclear employment policy and targeting strategy in detail?  Two very good works that I have read are:  Ball &amp; Richelson, eds., STRATEGIC NUCLEAR TARGETING, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986, and also Carter, Steinbruner &amp; Zraket, MANAGING NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1987.  Are there any similar detailed and scholarly works out there that examine these issues in the context of today&#039;s geopoligical situation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do any of your previous articles discuss strategic nuclear employment policy and targeting strategy in detail?  Two very good works that I have read are:  Ball &amp; Richelson, eds., STRATEGIC NUCLEAR TARGETING, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1986, and also Carter, Steinbruner &amp; Zraket, MANAGING NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1987.  Are there any similar detailed and scholarly works out there that examine these issues in the context of today&#8217;s geopoligical situation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Ten Foreign Policy Movies by Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/11/02/top-ten-foreign-policy-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=938#comment-3338</guid>
		<description>Back at DTRA we used to joke about Sean Connery&#039;s ability to speak Russian in Scottish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back at DTRA we used to joke about Sean Connery&#8217;s ability to speak Russian in Scottish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Best and the Brightest v2.0 by M.A.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/11/05/the-best-and-the-brightest-v2-0/comment-page-1/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>M.A.S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=1131#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Agree wholeheartedly with this post.   A common theme throughout HINAFP is the importance of maintaining credibility in deterrence policies.  What, in your opinion, would a &quot;cut and run&quot; decision on Afghanistan, do to the credibility of America&#039;s deterrence postures?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree wholeheartedly with this post.   A common theme throughout HINAFP is the importance of maintaining credibility in deterrence policies.  What, in your opinion, would a &#8220;cut and run&#8221; decision on Afghanistan, do to the credibility of America&#8217;s deterrence postures?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Top Ten Foreign Policy Movies by James Young</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/11/02/top-ten-foreign-policy-movies/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>James Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 03:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=938#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>Good list.  I&#039;d probably add &quot;Red Dawn,&quot; just for grins.  And virtually any Tom Clancy movie qualifies for consideration.  Had &quot;The Sum of All Fears&quot; remained faithful to the book, it might even top the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list.  I&#8217;d probably add &#8220;Red Dawn,&#8221; just for grins.  And virtually any Tom Clancy movie qualifies for consideration.  Had &#8220;The Sum of All Fears&#8221; remained faithful to the book, it might even top the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Obama Waiting for Tuesday&#8217;s Elections Before Making a Decision on Afghanistan? by Tom Skypek</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/30/is-obama-waiting-for-tuesdays-elections-before-making-a-decision-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Skypek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=957#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>I agree with your point--to a degree.  The outcome of the Afghan runoff is important with respect to the legitimacy of the Afghan government over the long haul.  I agree that over time a corrupt regime in Kabul will be seen as a U.S. puppet and will become a powerful recruitment tool for the Taliban.  However, there are established insurgents who need to be killed or captured, regardless of the runoff.  The results of the election will have absolutely no impact on their decision-making calculus, because their objective is to restore Taliban rule--not to build a credible, representative government.    

Moreover, to say that Obama&#039;s decision &quot;has nothing to do with domestic politics&quot; is not entirely accurate.  War is always a political decision.  If you subscribe to Clausewitz&#039;s definition of war, then it is simply an extension of politics by other means.  Whenever a president sends troops into harm&#039;s way, domestic political concerns are always a factor, particularly in a republic.  

My point on Afghanistan, however, is that Obama and his team cited Afghanistan as the forgotten war throughout the 2008 election.  They conducted their own major strategy review in the spring of this year.  Now, we&#039;re doing another strategy review.  Government loves strategy reviews.  Obviously, you want to make the right call, but it&#039;s difficult to send more troops at any time.  It will not be a popular decision and it&#039;s very possible that he&#039;s kicking the can down the road as long as he can.  This is the biggest decision of his life and he&#039;s very much of a middle-of-the-road guy.  At some point a leader needs to make a decision.  In the fog of war, you&#039;ll never have all the information you&#039;d like; there will always be uncertainty, but a decision needs to be made.  That much is owed to the troops who&#039;ve been fighting there for 8 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your point&#8211;to a degree.  The outcome of the Afghan runoff is important with respect to the legitimacy of the Afghan government over the long haul.  I agree that over time a corrupt regime in Kabul will be seen as a U.S. puppet and will become a powerful recruitment tool for the Taliban.  However, there are established insurgents who need to be killed or captured, regardless of the runoff.  The results of the election will have absolutely no impact on their decision-making calculus, because their objective is to restore Taliban rule&#8211;not to build a credible, representative government.    </p>
<p>Moreover, to say that Obama&#8217;s decision &#8220;has nothing to do with domestic politics&#8221; is not entirely accurate.  War is always a political decision.  If you subscribe to Clausewitz&#8217;s definition of war, then it is simply an extension of politics by other means.  Whenever a president sends troops into harm&#8217;s way, domestic political concerns are always a factor, particularly in a republic.  </p>
<p>My point on Afghanistan, however, is that Obama and his team cited Afghanistan as the forgotten war throughout the 2008 election.  They conducted their own major strategy review in the spring of this year.  Now, we&#8217;re doing another strategy review.  Government loves strategy reviews.  Obviously, you want to make the right call, but it&#8217;s difficult to send more troops at any time.  It will not be a popular decision and it&#8217;s very possible that he&#8217;s kicking the can down the road as long as he can.  This is the biggest decision of his life and he&#8217;s very much of a middle-of-the-road guy.  At some point a leader needs to make a decision.  In the fog of war, you&#8217;ll never have all the information you&#8217;d like; there will always be uncertainty, but a decision needs to be made.  That much is owed to the troops who&#8217;ve been fighting there for 8 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Obama Waiting for Tuesday&#8217;s Elections Before Making a Decision on Afghanistan? by TWH79</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/30/is-obama-waiting-for-tuesdays-elections-before-making-a-decision-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-3184</link>
		<dc:creator>TWH79</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 04:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=957#comment-3184</guid>
		<description>Actually, this has nothing to do with domestic politics.  Rather, it&#039;s all about local politics.  Obama cannot publicly comment on what his policy will be in Afghanistan until the results of the election in Afghanistan are resolved and accepted by the population for better or worse.  Any U.S. decisions, whether to increase troop levels or decrease them, will be seen by the local populace as interventionism, which is the last thing that is needed at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, this has nothing to do with domestic politics.  Rather, it&#8217;s all about local politics.  Obama cannot publicly comment on what his policy will be in Afghanistan until the results of the election in Afghanistan are resolved and accepted by the population for better or worse.  Any U.S. decisions, whether to increase troop levels or decrease them, will be seen by the local populace as interventionism, which is the last thing that is needed at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Senate Finance Committee Health Bill:  1,502 Pages by Publius</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/19/senate-finance-committee-bill-1502-pages/comment-page-1/#comment-3182</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=834#comment-3182</guid>
		<description>Legislation should be limited to 100 pages.  Normal, every-day folk should have the opportunity to read and understand the laws that are being passed by their elected representatives while they drink their coffee on the weekends.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legislation should be limited to 100 pages.  Normal, every-day folk should have the opportunity to read and understand the laws that are being passed by their elected representatives while they drink their coffee on the weekends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Combating the September 10th Mindset:  New Website for Intelligence Officers Threatened with Investigation by Publius</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/29/combating-the-september-10th-mindset-new-website-for-intelligence-officers-threated-with-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-3181</link>
		<dc:creator>Publius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=951#comment-3181</guid>
		<description>President Obama can only play the Bush card for so long (See Krauthammer in today&#039;s Washington Post today...http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/29/AR2009102903920.html) .  To have any chance of a re-election in 2012, he would need to quit playing the politics of Washington and make the difficult but truly courageous decision to either: 1)  fully provide the resources required to succeed, or 2) drawdown into a purely counter-terrorism operation ala George Will.  Anything in-between (McChrystal-lite) would betray the American electorate and result in the comeback of the Republican party come 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama can only play the Bush card for so long (See Krauthammer in today&#8217;s Washington Post today&#8230;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/29/AR2009102903920.html) .  To have any chance of a re-election in 2012, he would need to quit playing the politics of Washington and make the difficult but truly courageous decision to either: 1)  fully provide the resources required to succeed, or 2) drawdown into a purely counter-terrorism operation ala George Will.  Anything in-between (McChrystal-lite) would betray the American electorate and result in the comeback of the Republican party come 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Jon Kyl Takes Lead on Nuclear Policy by annuit coeptis</title>
		<link>http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/2009/10/21/jon-kyl-takes-lead-on-nuclear-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-3155</link>
		<dc:creator>annuit coeptis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 16:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hopeisnotaforeignpolicy.org/?p=841#comment-3155</guid>
		<description>Given the proliferation of blogs advocating ideologically-driven arms control, I am very glad to see blogs like this one and http://www.rooseveltroom.net/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the proliferation of blogs advocating ideologically-driven arms control, I am very glad to see blogs like this one and <a href="http://www.rooseveltroom.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.rooseveltroom.net/</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
